Looking at Wikipedia also reminded me of a contested word during a heated game of Quiddler with my mom and sons not long ago. Our family games of Quiddler and Bananagrams get quite competitive and spirited. On this occasion, my middle son wanted to use the word ower. The rest of us protested, asking about its definition. He pulled out his iPod Touch and looked up the word, reporting that it means "a person who owes money." The librarian in me asked, "What is your source?" He told us it was wiktionary.org. Well. We demanded that he check the word in other dictionary sources, and indeed, it was not listed.
Does that mean it will never be an accepted word in the lexicon? Will ower ever be in common dictionaries? It might. But it did not get counted among accepted words in the game...and caused us to discuss again the accuracy of sources and the need for ethical choices when posting information for public use.
Today, when I reached the very top of Squaw Peak at Squaw Valley, CA, I added a stone to the top of a cairn overlooking the valley (NOT a stone I had carried from the bottom of the trail, however).
ReplyDeleteAnd reading your thoughts about the appearance of words in a "real" dictionary naturally made me think of FRINDLE, one of my very favorite middle grade novels.
I loved Frindle, too, David. Wouldn't it be grand to make a cairn of words like ower and frindle?
ReplyDeleteLove the cairn and the tradition of taking a stone from the bottom up to the top!
ReplyDelete